Thursday 30 June 2016

Growth in income lags very far behind rises in rent

If you haven’t heard, it’s not easy for renters these days. But the complaints are not an exaggeration.
Examining census data from 1960 to present day, a new report has illustrated the drastic — but very real — drop in housing affordability nationwide.
Though median rents have increased by 64 percent between 1960 and 2014, median household incomes grew by only 18 percent in the same time, according to an analysis by rental listing website Apartment List cited by the Wall Street Journal.
And unless something major happens, the trajectory will continue.
Renters had the worst of it between 2000 and 2010, according to the Journal — thanks in part to a recession and then a housing bust, inflation-adjusted household incomes fell by 9 percent while rents increased by 18 percent during that period.
Economic crises notwithstanding, reasons for today’s challenging housing situation include land-use restrictions, rising construction costs and disproportional migration trends, in which more people are moving to already-expensive cities like New York and San Francisco. Whereas globalization has driven down the cost of other products, housing still relies on domestic resources, according to the Journal.
Predictably, Apartment List cites the worst cities for renters as San Francisco, New York City, Boston and Washington D.C. There are, however, cost-effective options. For instance, in Austin, income growth has matched that of rent in recent years. And not all renters are flailing.
A report by property management software maker RealPage found that the trend of rising rents and diminishing housing supply has little negative impact on mid- and high-earning renters. It’s low-income households that suffer the most from the affordable housing crisis. [WSJ] — Cathaleen Chen
Know more about the real estate advisor - Keith Knutsson:

Tuesday 28 June 2016

How the UK's exit benefits US REITs

They are considered safe, and they offer yield. No wonder the stocks of real estate investment trusts ran in the opposite direction of the Brexit-bashed U.S. stock market Friday.
Last fall, interest in REITs had begun to wane, as expectations of higher interest rates outweighed solid fundamentals in the real estate market. Now REITs, and the real estate underlying them, are the power play for the anxious investor.
"Anything that is going to drive the 10 year lower is a positive for REITs. Three-and-a-half percent dividend yield with 6 to 7 percent earnings growth is pretty darned attractive in this environment," said Alexander Goldfarb, senior REIT analyst at Sandler O'Neill.
REITs will also benefit from rising commercial real estate values, as foreign investors continue to pour money into the U.S. office, retail and even apartment space. They had been doing that already, but Brexit will only accelerate the pace, especially of Chinese and Middle Eastern money entering the U.S. brick-and-mortar markets.
The continued flight to the safe harbor of American properties in gateway markets like New York and San Francisco reflects persistent economic and political instability in other parts of the world," said Sam Chandan, founder and chief economist of Chandan Economics. "The U.K.'s decision to exit the European Union underscores the U.S. investment thesis and could trigger a new wave of foreign capital inflows to high-quality, well-located assets."
New York City office space is already a favorite among foreign investors. Witness the high-profile sale of Manhattan's former Sony Building to Saudi Arabia's Olayan Group. The "Chippendale" towerreportedly sold for more than $1.4 billion, netting seller Joseph Chetrit a $300 million profit. New York hotels are also favored in foreign deals.
"Large institutional investors pay for New York, as they look at it more as a store of value. Growth is gravy," said Goldfarb. "They're looking to park capital. Foreigners, high net worth, really look to New York. If any sector is going to be the biggest beneficiary, it's that."
The kind of commercial real estate international buyers purchase really depends on where they're coming from. 
"The Chinese buyers tend to be very focused on office buildings in high-profile markets like New York and San Francisco," said Rick Sharga, chief marketing officer of Ten-X, a real estate auction platform. "We do see a lot of multifamily and retail purchase activity by certain foreign buyers, and there are other parts of Asia where the buyers really specialize in hotels."
As for U.S. REIT exposure overseas, there is not a lot. Prologis, a warehouse REIT, does have exposure in the U.K. and Europe, but, on the flip side, could benefit from a potential increase in imports into the U.S. Simon Property owns stakes in malls in Europe and outlets in Asia, but people are going to continue to go shopping, and the underlying fundamentals in most sectors appear solid.
"Broadly speaking, European logistics is in a good spot. There is a lot of demand. Office or retail, there is a very strong fundamental underlying dynamic. They are not negatively impacted by the U.K. Vacancy rates are significantly below long-term averages," said Tom Mundy, director of research, EMEA at JLL.
REIT stocks did fall in early trading Monday, but not nearly as far as the S&P and Nasdaq. They continue to outperform broader markets.
Know more about the real estate advisor - Keith Knutsson:

Sunday 26 June 2016

After the ‘Brexit’ vote, potential winners and loser in real estate


Even before news of a Brexit made its way around the world, high-end brokerages and developers throughout London were already getting inquiries on behalf of foreign buyers hoping to take advantage of the tumbling pound.
The significance of the British exit from the European Union was not lost on anyone. There was an immediate financial impact, as markets took a dive, and there will certainly be many more implications in the days and weeks to come.
Here is a look at some of the predicted winners and losers in the real-estate arena.
WINNERS:
Foreign buyers of London real estate will get increased value in purchasing properties as a result of a depreciating sterling. “This will now create a short-term buying opportunity for U.S. dollar- and euro- based property investors,” said Peter Wetherell, chief executive of Wetherell, a Mayfair-based broker. “For overseas buyers, this big and dramatic drop in the value of sterling will effectively offset the Stamp Duty and tax adjustments and it will make prime London property a lucrative investment for overseas investors bold enough to take a punt despite the market uncertainty.”
LOSERS:
London-based property buyers will face competition from foreign purchasers in addition to dealing with the uncertainty of their own local economy. “A fall in London house prices caused by a Brexit in the long [run] will not benefit many domestic buyers, for example, if a Brexit causes -- as predicted by many -- wide-ranging job losses and a general slowdown in the economy,” said Martin Bikhit, Managing Director of Marylebone estate agent Kay & Co.
Know more about the real estate advisor - Keith Knutsson:

Tuesday 21 June 2016

Einstein’s lesson on Real Estate!

The debate of its veracity aside, Albert Einstein reportedly said, in some variation or another, that “the most powerful force in the universe is compound interest.” It is unimportant whether he actually said it. What is important is that we believe that the most important figure in physics and mathematics who ever lived actually believed it. It is also important because it is an obvious truth, and like gravity, we take it for granted.
Real estate developers and investors, the financiers who leverage them, or your pension fund that invests in real estate, all live by this fundamental rule. It is far better to earn a consistent 3 percent per year with no reversals against the principal than to have a volatile real estate investment return pattern gaining 10 percent in years one to three, and then losing 5 percent per year for the next three years. A single dollar invested in 2016 that returns 3 percent for six years results in a return of and on your money of $1.19. The same dollar growing 10 percent for three years and losing 4 percent for three years returns $1.17. These spreads on volatility get much wider in 20- and 30-year periods.
Anthony M. Graziano is senior managing director for Integra Realty Resources — Miami/Palm Beach, based in Coral Gables.
So when we look at the increasing purchase prices of rental apartment buildings, we see that they’re expensive — particularly because there are many that are being built. This could lead to declines in rent and higher vacancies, both affecting the net amount an investor receives in net operating income. And yet the major multifamily complexes around South Florida continue to be acquired at ever-higher prices.
The market is thinking about Einstein:
The investment market in commercial real estate assets, whether they are multifamily rental complexes, hotels, office buildings or shopping centers, are investing to generate net income after expenses. Their overall investment returns (yields) are derived from the net income they receive annually (from tenant rents) plus the price for which they ultimately sell the building.
But when the economic outlook is weakening, hotel revenues from leisure and business travel, and retail rental income, all driven by discretionary spending, become more suspect. When the investment market senses economic weakness or desires a flight to safety, investors flock to multifamily assets.
In many ways, this investment strategy is rooted in the cultural and social changes of the past 50 years. Our habits and changes in the workplace affect office utilization; our changing spending patterns and acceptance of online marketplaces are changing retail habits; and our worldwide logistics systems are changing industrial utilization patterns. What has not changed fundamentally is where and how we live — as my grandpa’s old friend Myron Cohen used to say, “Everybody has to be somewhere” — except that in the decades ahead, more people will live in urbanized areas.
In looking forward into 2017, there remains a fair degree of concern regarding the level of multifamily rental supply under construction in South Florida. The supply pipeline is a reaction to the growth in rents, coupled with a period of pent-up demand when almost no construction was present (2009-11). The federal government spurred multifamily investment and housing construction with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development financing programs offering longer loan terms and fixed interest rate financing. To compete, the banks have been more aggressive in multifamily lending, particularly on new construction. All of these factors are focusing cheap capital toward new multifamily construction.
But this upcoming pipeline of multifamily rental complexes is part of the key to the stability of multifamily generally. In Miami-Dade, Class A multifamily (the newest, most luxurious rental complexes) has experienced rent growth over 4 percent for three years running. Vacancies in the Class B product are below 4 percent, so Class B prices (second-tier rental products that are 10-20 years old) will continue to rise, lifting demand for new Class A product. While new supply may force Class A vacancy higher (which in fact it did in 2015 and 2016), slowing rent growth to 2 percent to 3 percent has been the success and stability of the multifamily investment class for decades. The new product tends to match better the tastes and lifestyles of the new generation of renters, and over a 10- to 20-year investment cycle, the sector outperforms with steady 2 percent to 3 percent average annual investment growth.
I’ve been through four major investment cycles in my career, including the one that saw the U.S.-owned Resolution Trust Corp. liquidate real estate assets in the early 1990s, and the only people I ever knew who ever lost money in multifamily investments were those who over-leveraged themselves with too much bank debt or who unsuccessfully tried to convert their 1970s apartment complex into condominiums only to get 30 percent sold out and lose the property to their debtors.
On the whole, multifamily investment that is not over-leveraged compounds geometrically. This applies to four- and eight-unit apartment complexes as easily as 300-unit complexes. The only difference is the amount of the initial investment that compounds.
So let’s not lament the multifamily pipeline as an evil harbinger of doom and destruction. This is not to say that every developer should take their condominium plan and convert to rentals next week. But under current economic conditions, watch the multifamily landscape in the coming 12 months. It speaks volumes about where the market sees the economy heading.
Whether he said it or not, my money is on Einstein and low-debt multifamily investments heading into 2017.
ANTHONY M. GRAZIANO IS SENIOR MANAGING DIRECTOR FOR INTEGRA REALTY RESOURCES — MIAMI/PALM BEACH, BASED IN CORAL GABLES. HE HAS BEEN INVOLVED IN THE REAL ESTATE FIELD SINCE 1986. HE CAN BE REACHED AT AMGRAZIANO@IRR.COM AND WWW.IRR.COM.
S. FLORIDA MULTIFAMILY RENT GROWTH, BY PROPERTY CLASS.
The percentages represent year-over-year average rent growth in Class A (the newest, most luxurious rental complexes) and Class B (second-tier rental products that are 10-20 years old) in Miami-Dade and Broward counties.
Year
Class A
Class B
2005
4.00%
5.45%
2006
6.15%
7.05%
2007
1.65%
1.75%
2008
-0.65%
-0.55%
2009
-2.90%
-2.00%
2010
2.50%
1.50%
2011
0.25%
1.30%
2012
3.45%
2.45%
2013
3.50%
2.95%
2014
3.80%
3.65%
2015
4.45%
3.35%
2016 (first quarter)
0.85%
0.45%
Average
2.38%
2.45


Know more about the real estate advisor - Keith Knutsson:

Monday 20 June 2016

A storm is brewing in the real-estate market, Pimco warns


Pacific Investment Management Co. is pointing to gathering clouds in the roughly $3 trillion commercial real-estate market.
“…[A] confluence of factors—volatility in public markets, tightened regulations, maturing loans and uncertain foreign capital flows—is creating a blast of volatility for U.S. commercial real estate,” said Pimco’s John Murray, in a report jointly written with Anthony Clarke.
That volatility could lead to prices falling by as much as 5% in the coming year for so-called commercial mortgage-backed securities associated with the financing of properties, including shopping malls, apartment complexes and office buildings, according to Pimco’s “U.S. Real Estate: A Storm Is Brewing.

Since the financial crisis, commercial mortgage-bond prices, which got whacked along with a broad swath of complex mortgage-related debt during the 2008 housing-market implosion, have recovered. Pimco attributes improvements in performance to demand for commercial bonds and warns that appetite is likely to peter out in coming months.
“Capital flows have grown unstable over the past year due to fears over interest rate hikes and, more recently, events such as political and economic uncertainty in China,” Murray wrote. “While this instability began in the public CRE markets, it has blown in to private CRE as well, particularly in non-major markets.”
Hundreds of billions of commercial bonds originated 10-years ago are set to mature over the next three years and appetite for higher-yields than CMBS offers is putting pressure on borrowers’ ability to obtain fresh financing and that’s pressuring bond prices.
Contributing to concerns about commercial real estate bonds is a shrinking base of ready buyers that has coincided with increased price volatility, Pimco cautioned.
New rules, which attempt to limit financial firms’ exposures to risky assets in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, have caused banks to trim their dealer inventories, Pimco explained. A lack of banks serving as so-called market makers has been one of the oft-cited factors associated with a huge swing higher in the prices of Treasurys back on Oct. 15 2014.
But it isn’t all doom and gloom for commercial real estate debt.
Pimco said opportunities may arise from the shakeout, in both real estate and equities, which have shown a close relationship of late. Daily returns of real-estate investment trusts have had a 71% positive correlation to the broader S&P 500SPX, +0.58%  since the beginning of 2015, the report showed. In other words, rises in stock prices have tended to coincide with richer returns for REITs.
“For flexible capital, this storm might be a welcome one indeed,” Murray wrote.
Know more about the real estate advisor - Keith Knutsson:

Sunday 19 June 2016

Macy’s is more of a real estate company than a retailer


Over the past year and a half, Macy’s financial performance has been sobering, to say the least. Like fellow department store companies Kohl’s and Dillard’s, Macy’s has reported a double-digit drop in earnings per share since the beginning of 2015. Macy’s revenue has declined by more than 5 percent in that time span, which was worse than either Kohl’s or Dillard’s.
Due to this rapid reversal in EPS, shares of all three companies have plummeted by 40 percent to 50 percent since the beginning of 2015. However, in the case of Macy’s, this huge stock decline looks like an overreaction. That’s because Macy’s owns a large portfolio of real estate, which now accounts for the vast majority of its value.
A retail turnaround could be tough to execute
Not surprisingly, executives at Macy’s, Kohl’s, and Dillard’s are promising to get earnings back on track in the next couple of years. Despite its falling margins, Macy’s has repeatedly affirmed that it will eventually return to its target EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margin of 14 percent.
Unfortunately, it’s not clear that retailers will ever be able to sustain the margins they earned in the past. Amazon.com is making a big push into the fashion market, with considerable success. This development will pressure department stores’ profitability for the foreseeable future.
That’s not to say that department stores with solid franchises like Macy’s, Kohl’s, and Dillard’s are doomed. Nevertheless, given Jeff Bezos’ “your margin is my opportunity” philosophy, they will probably need to accept lower margins to avoid massive market-share losses.
There’s more to the story than retail
Thus, just based on Macy’s recent financial results and the future prospects for its retail business, the company’s stock price decline seems well deserved. However, analysts who examine only Macy’s current sales and profitability trends are overlooking the company’s key source of value: its real estate.
Hedge fund Starboard Value published an analysis earlier this year valuing Macy’s real estate at nearly $21 billion. That’s 20 percent above Macy’s current enterprise value (the total value of its stock and outstanding debt).
Real estate valuation is a somewhat subjective process. The value of Macy’s mall-based stores in particular could be impacted by the ongoing shift of retail sales to the Internet. Still, about 35 percent of the estimated real estate value comes from stores in A, A+, and A++ rated malls — the top-performing malls in the country.
Moreover, another 35 pecent of the estimated real estate value comes from eight “downtown” stores, mainly in major cities like New York, Chicago, Minneapolis, and San Francisco. Much of this real estate could be more valuable if it is repurposed for office or residential use. That means a retail downturn wouldn’t hurt its value.
Other department stores like Kohl’s and Dillard’s have much less valuable real estate than Macy’s. That means they must revitalize their underlying retail businesses to create value for their shareholders.
Macy’s is taking action
Of course, Macy’s valuable real estate might not be worth much to shareholders if the company’s management were adamantly opposed to monetizing it.
Yet that’s not the case. Macy’s has shown in the past year or so that it is determined to extract value from its real estate — it’s just going to take time, due to the complexity of most real estate deals.
In April, Macy’s hired real estate industry veteran Douglas Sesler to fill a new role as its executive VP for real estate. Furthermore, Macy’s has announced a handful of real estate deals in the past couple of years. It closed stores in Cupertino, California, and Pittsburgh and sold them to third parties. Meanwhile, it sold the underutilized upper floors of two downtown stores in Brooklyn and Seattle.
Just last week, Macy’s sold a downtown location in Spokane, Washington, just a few months after closing that store. This was a relatively small transaction — the Spokane building’s assessed value is $6.8 million — which may have helped Macy’s close the sale quickly. Still, it provides another example of Macy’s increased focus on monetizing its real estate.
Value will shine through soon
Thus far, Macy’s shareholders haven’t really benefited from the company’s real estate initiatives. Macy’s stock remains near a multiyear low. But it has only been seven months since Macy’s announced plans to explore real estate monetization strategies. From the beginning, Macy’s management has suggested that it would take a year or two to nail down any major real estate transactions.
As Macy’s announces larger real estate sales or joint ventures — something that will hopefully begin in the next six to 12 months — investors may finally look beyond the company’s subpar sales and earnings results and recognize the value of its real estate. That should help Macy’s stock get back on track.
Adam Levine-Weinberg owns shares of Macy’s, Inc. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Amazon.com. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Know more about the real estate advisor - Keith Knutsson: